RSSAC001 wrt to 2870Bis

[Marc Blanchet]

Terry,
 now that you have issued a one week LC, I think it is the time to tighten the relationship between the two documents (rssac01 and 2870bis). I'm providing here some suggested changes for this, feel free to wordsmit if needed.

Regards, Marc.



Le 2014-09-24 à 08:23, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson at icann.org> a écrit :
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RSSAC001- Service Expectations of Root	Servers-2014-10-09-TJM-mb.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 69120 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.liman.se/pipermail/iab2870bis/attachments/20150930/59dab0eb/attachment.doc>
-------------- next part --------------

> Hi Lars,
> 
> On 15/09/2014 5:42 pm, "Lars-Johan Liman" <liman at netnod.se> wrote:
> 
>> terry.manderson at icann.org:
>>> Mark and Lars,
>> 
>> Hi, Terry!
>> 
>> ... and thanks for pushing this forward!
>> 
>>> As document leaders for RSSAC001, Joe and I are taking this opportunity
>>> to
>>> reach out regarding RSSAC001 noting the observed interdependencies
>>> between
>>> 2870bis and RSSAC001.
>> 
>>> We are working toward a timeline for delivering RSSAC001 to the RSSAC,
>>> and
>>> while we are still some 8 weeks of that due date review has been
>>> performed
>>> by the RSSAC Caucus. We are now soliciting feedback from both of you and
>>> any other parties involved in the construction of 2870bis.
>> 
>>> We accept time (your) is precious, so Joe and I also offer review time
>>> for
>>> 2870bis and our thanks for reading through RSSAC001.
>> 
>> I'll let Marc respond, as he's "on top of" the schedule for 2870". If
>> there's an opportunity to get them back in sync, I think we should take
>> it.
> 
> Please let us know!!
> 
>> 
>> Marc, what's the exact current status of 2870"? I seem to remember there
>> was an IAB last call, and comments from Paul Hoffman, but that was
>> before(?) we published the draft version of RSSAC001, no? What happened
>> then?
>> 
>> Terry, the last things I see on the caucus list is the solicitation for
>> outstanding issues (excellent!), and the ensuing thread. Has there been
>> any changes to the text in RSSAC001 since then?
> 
> There hasn't been (from what I see) any substantive changes to the text.
> Admittedly the document was well formed already and really just needs a
> good editing.
> 
> Joe and I will come together very soon on that.
> 
> Please feel free to update the RSSAC with this info. (I am unable to make
> the exec call today)
> 
> Cheers
> Terry