<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>Le 2014-09-24 à 08:23, Terry Manderson <<a href="mailto:terry.manderson@icann.org">terry.manderson@icann.org</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">Hi Lars,<br><br>On 15/09/2014 5:42 pm, "Lars-Johan Liman" <<a href="mailto:liman@netnod.se">liman@netnod.se</a>> wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:terry.manderson@icann.org">terry.manderson@icann.org</a>:<br><blockquote type="cite">Mark and Lars,<br></blockquote><br>Hi, Terry!<br><br>... and thanks for pushing this forward!<br><br><blockquote type="cite">As document leaders for RSSAC001, Joe and I are taking this opportunity<br>to<br>reach out regarding RSSAC001 noting the observed interdependencies<br>between<br>2870bis and RSSAC001.<br></blockquote><br><blockquote type="cite">We are working toward a timeline for delivering RSSAC001 to the RSSAC,<br>and<br>while we are still some 8 weeks of that due date review has been<br>performed<br>by the RSSAC Caucus. We are now soliciting feedback from both of you and<br>any other parties involved in the construction of 2870bis.<br></blockquote><br><blockquote type="cite">We accept time (your) is precious, so Joe and I also offer review time<br>for<br>2870bis and our thanks for reading through RSSAC001.<br></blockquote><br>I'll let Marc respond, as he's "on top of" the schedule for 2870". If<br>there's an opportunity to get them back in sync, I think we should take<br>it.<br></blockquote><br>Please let us know!!<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>sorry for late responding. I think this thread became lost.</div><div><br></div><div>update to 2870 has past IETF last call. There were some comments, which justify a new version of the draft. The main comment people made was _exactly_ about the fact that it refers to the RSSAC document which does not exist yet as a stable reference. Remember that we wanted to publish them in sync... So seeing (finally) some movement on the caucus and on the RSSAC document, I put the update of the 2870 draft on hold, wishing that it would come into final stage (or at least stable reference) soon....</div><div><br></div><div>So, on purpose, I have not move 2870bis draft to see if we can still achieve the sync. </div><div><br></div><div>So now is the time to get them in sync... please finish the RSSAC document soon and we will accomplish the original goal.</div><div><br></div><div>Marc.</div><div><br></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>Marc, what's the exact current status of 2870"? I seem to remember there<br>was an IAB last call, and comments from Paul Hoffman, but that was<br>before(?) we published the draft version of RSSAC001, no? What happened<br>then?<br><br>Terry, the last things I see on the caucus list is the solicitation for<br>outstanding issues (excellent!), and the ensuing thread. Has there been<br>any changes to the text in RSSAC001 since then?<br></blockquote><br>There hasn't been (from what I see) any substantive changes to the text.<br>Admittedly the document was well formed already and really just needs a<br>good editing.<br><br>Joe and I will come together very soon on that.<br><br>Please feel free to update the RSSAC with this info. (I am unable to make<br>the exec call today)<br><br>Cheers<br>Terry</div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>